Some Thoughts on Mannatech and/or Glyconutrients

A recent recommendation by a friend of mine brought this post to my mind. The recommendation was for my wife, who has not been feeling well for weeks, primarily because of morning sickness (btw, if you didn’t know, we’re having a baby!!!1)

The recommendation was to consider taking Ambrotose, the headline product made by a company called Mannatech as a potential way to alleviate some of the issues Heather’s been having. His wife had had similar issues and had noticed a difference when taking Ambrotose.

A little background info – Over the past few years, I’ve had a decent number of friends (7-10) purchase Mannatech products and said that they had see a difference in their life. During the time that I first heard of Mannatech and heard a sales pitch for it, I did what I do for most things I don’t know much about – I researched it. This process tends to be a bit more detailed when said thing desires money from me =). This was in 2006/2007.

Before I get in to what my research “found”, a brief aside – I am a cynic by nature, and my primary means of researching topics tends to be through the Internet. I realize these two traits means that I could pretty much disprove any idea or theory anyone ever had, by finding some whacko writing about how it’s untrue on some no-name blog. As such please bear with me and keep that in mind, and I’ll do my part to try and be impartial and present the truth – if that’s possibe.

So anyway, at the time of my first hearing of Mannatech, my research was generally inconclusive. The company was not well-known, and there was not a large amount of information on non-Mannatech websites. I’ll freely admit that I was skeptical from the beginning. Furthermore, Heather and I were in generally decent physical health, and didn’t really have the money to put forth $50 to $100 every-other-month for something we didn’t truly need.

Since that time, out of curiosity, I’ll google a few words related to the topic every couple months – specifically, Mannatech, glyconutrients, etc. I’ll check the wikipedia articles, and find forums where the topics are discussed back and forth, by supporters and detractors.

Given that the below points get kind of wordy, I’ll go ahead and summarize as succinctly as I can:


Though I have reasons to be completely in doubt of Mannatech and the glyconutrients they market, I cannot say for sure that their products are fraudulent. The anecdotal evidence provided by my friends would indicate that they can have a positive effect, but points #2 and #3 listed below makes it difficult for me to support a company with a growing history of deception and use of multi-level marketing to sell it’s products.

That said, here’s the things that I’ve found over the past three years that support what I’ve just said above. Read on if you care, stop now if you don’t =).

1. There is a disconnect in the science presented by Mannatech. This first and foremost reason tends to be the purpose of me googling terms about Mannatech. A study that decisively proves that taking glyconutrients would raise energy levels, or cure a disease, or anything would go a very long way to silencing my concerns. Something that I could use, that would make my life better. Sure, that’s a very consumeristic viewpoint, but they’re marketing a product for me to buy, and it’s not cheap.

To date, I’ve not seen such a study , so I can only conclude 1 of 3 things:

a. Studies were done, but proved little to nothing, and were not promoted.
b. Studies were not done and will not be done, and Mannatech has no desire to make their product have definitive proof behind it. This is either because they don’t care about people like me, they’re satisfied with their word-of-mouth endorsements, or they know nothing would be proven. As I don’t buy any products from them, the “why” of this doesn’t matter to much to me either way.
c. Studies are in progress, and take a long time. Hence I continue to search the internet, in case c is the answer.

I know this may seem sarcastic, but I’d love to be proven wrong on this point. If I didn’t, I wouldn’t keep trying to find a study that proves such things.

2. There are indications of deception in the leadership of Mannatech. Two main indicators here:

a. Sam Caster, the founder of Mannatech, has had two business ventures before Mannatech declared as hoaxes and not providing the benefits as advertised by the Texas Attorney General’s office. link. This point by itself is not enough to make a huge difference, but doesn’t lend credence to Mannatech’s credibility.

b. Mannatech paid $6 million settlement in a lawsuit stating that Mannatech launched “an unlawful marketing scheme” that over-promised what the effects of their products would be, including potentially curing Downs Syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and cancer. link. Speaks for itself. I recall in the sales pitch I saw seeing a picture of a girl with Downs Syndrome, and then another picture of the same girl that did not appear to have DS any longer (as far as physical appearance goes). The implication was that glyconutrients was responsible for this change.

There was a seperate lawsuit, that Mannatech settled for 11.25 million, that was the result of similar claims being made. As it was settled out of court, Mannatech admitted no wrongdoing (unless $11.25 million out of your pocket means your wrong). link.
3. Mannatech is sold only through network marketing / multi-level marketing (MLM).

This one is more of a personal issue for me, and doesn’t necessarily say anything about the products efficacy. MLM raises two large red flags in my mind:

a. The inspiration that selling Mannatech will allow a person to reach “financial freedom” as mentioned on their Opportunity website. In MLM-speak, “financial freedom” is a euphemism for millions of dollars for little work. It’s laced with greed, which is ironic because….

b. Very few sellers in MLM networks break even, and even less of them make large amounts of money. The very nature of a business that requires exponentially more people for any one person to make money requires that the last people, the people at the bottom of these downlines, to completely lose out.

I’ll grant Mannatech that their marketing focuses more on the product than the opportunity to sell the product, but the point remains.

That’s all I have to say on this topic, for now. As always, your comments, emails, etc. are welcome.

Comments (4)

Jerry WiensMarch 21st, 2009 at 11:13 am

All wellness issues start at the cellular level. When cells go bad they eventually reach a critical mass at which time they begin to reveal symptoms. Symptoms are not the problem, they are simply the body telling us their is a problem at the cellular level. Most treatments will only mask symptoms, never addressing the underlying cause at cellular level.

Practically all Wellness problems have a nutritional component. Mannatech’s products are not designed to treat any disease, but to restore missing (or short supply of) nutritional components to the body. The body is pre-progammed to use nutrition and will use it as it sees fit….normal physicological processes.

Because the body determines how nutrition will be used and because clinical studies cost so much, few studies are done on nutritional interventions. Producers of nutritional products are not able to charge what drug companies charge for their products.

Nonetheless, some studies have been done on glyconutrients and others of Mannatech’s products. Others are in process. You can access the studies at http://www.MannatechScience.org. Also, there is plenty of “open source” literature available on the various glyconutrients by simply googling any of them by name: Xylose, fucose, galactose, glucose, etc, etc.

Kyle TheobaldMarch 21st, 2009 at 7:16 pm

http://www.mannatechscience.org; http://fisherinstitute.com/live_pages/home.php

They won’t publish studies on disease anymore though because the FDA and European Union regs will not allow nutritional elements to be sold (except by drug companies) that have a drug effect (show definitive clinical proof of ‘curing’ a disease). They had that happen with glucosamine in Europe.

PS26March 22nd, 2009 at 3:57 am

thanks…i really appreciate all the information. i’ve heard a lot in the past from different people on this, but no real information, so its good to hear the information in such a factual way. i have to agree on a couple of points that should be huge red flags.

1) The leadership….if the main guy has had one mistake, ok, but if he’s had 2 businesses that were fraudulent, sorry, no more credibility…ever. Seriously the leadership says everything about the business. If the guy can’t be an honest businessman, he should go work for a business that is already honest and be forced to learn himself…not run a multi-million dollar business. I wish we could have “business jail” where people can’t open up businesses again if they have been fraudulent in the past. Honest business is not that hard and its what people deserve.

2) Market schemes…even if they are not emphasizing the selling point (props to them for downplaying something that people have already caught on to and realize its dishonest nature)…this is even better marketing and an even better scheme. One step lower. Hate it. Don’t approve of it. Sell your product like everyone else…in stores. If you truly believe in it…you will want to get it out to as many people as possible…and stores is the best way. If it really cures diseases…the business should want to get it to everyone and one-by-one marketing is not to the masses…but its a selling method…its about the money, not the product.

So, that’s my opinion for businesses in general…and this one seems to fit it. I encourage everyone to stay away from wasting their money on these things. However, I do believe in eating healthily, well, staying away from pesticides foods and preservatives and all the other nutrition stuff that’s really much harder than taking the pills.

EricMarch 23rd, 2009 at 10:02 am

Thanks for sharing, everyone. I especially appreciate your comment, Kyle.

I hadn’t looked thoroughly at mannatechscience.org in a while, but I took some time to check it out today, and look at the published studies. There was definitely more than I expected, and I read all of the abstracts for ones that were published to the site.

A few observations:

Effects of a carbohydrate supplement upon resting brain activity – I’m fairly sure what this says is… sugar (specifically, glucose) gives you a sugar rush in your brain. I think I’ve proved this one adequately with my own research of glucose :p.

Effects of a Glyconutritional Supplement on Brain Potentials Associated with Language Processing – This one is clearly a bit more complex. While explaining alot more thoroughly, and using pretty graphs, it again seems to state that sugar makes your head work faster, specifically as far as reaction times go. Take-away quote from conclusion: “Although treatment-related reaction times were in the predicted direction, i.e., reduced in the supplement relative to the placebo condition, these differences were not statistically significant.”

An Open-Label Pilot Study of the Antioxidant Effect in Healthy People of Ambrotose AO™ – Summary – a supplement with anti-oxidants (in this case, Ambrotose AO), results in higher levels of anti-oxidants in test subjects. Makes sense, and seems to be what I or anyone else would expect.

Human Colonic Bacteria Can Utilize Stabilized Aloe Vera Gel Polysaccharides and a Mixed Saccharide-Based Glyconutritional Dietary Supplement, Advanced Ambrotose – Not gonna lie, not exactly sure what’s being tested, and what difference it makes. As far as I can tell, It basically says the colon can use aloe vera and the elements of Ambrotose. Seems to be a promising study if what those effects are can be measured. Seems to be a study that would be a starting point for more advanced studies, yet to come.

That’s enough for now, the other studies are either about basic components that exist in Ambrotose, or completely unrelated products. Not saying they aren’t important, just that they aren’t relevant to the issues at hand, at least in my mind.

Leave a comment

Your comment