The emergent movement, explained in DDR terms.

Since I had first heard about it, the emergent movement has been somewhat confusing to me. The most common explanation of what it is… is this, ” a conversation concerned with the deconstruction and reconstruction of protestant Christianity.”

Uh, what? The deconstruction and reconstruction? I’m so confused.

So I read the books (well, am reading), looked at writings of the largest proponents, tried to get a handle on what this all means. I think I’m starting to, and one of the best ways to learn something is to have to teach it, sooo… here we go!

We’re gonna focus on the terms “deconstruction and reconstruction.” And we’re gonna try and apply it to something that is abit more abstract that theology or doctrine. We’re going to use Dance Dance Revolution, or simply “DDR.” If this is a new phrase to you, read this post first.

A week or so ago, still Internet-less at the crib, I was DDRing up a storm. It was amazing. I was like a machine. Something was very apparent though, that I had known for some time. You see, in the easy and moderate difficulty DDR songs, it does not really matter which arrows you press with which feet… that is to say, if the arrow pattern is Left, Down, Left, Down, its very easy to press all of those with your left foot. Let’s make this visual.

ddr1.JPG

Assuming a bit of experience, most DDR players can easily hit all those with one foot, and its fine.

This approach, broadly defined as a way of ddr’ing that makes no big issue of which foot you use to press which arrow, works perfectly through 90% of the DDR songs. As you approach the high-end, the model breaks down. You see, at the hardest levels of DDR songs, you don’t have a chance to press two arrows in a row with the same foot, as the song is simply too fast to allow your body to move that fast. Again, lets do this visually. Imagine attempting to press all of these arrows in 6 to 10 seconds with one foot:

ddr2.JPG

(for the musically inclined, the red arrows are quarter note beats, the blue are eigth notes, and the purple are sixteenth notes. I think.)

How does this relate to the emergent movement? The motivation behind this deconstruction and reconstruction comes from the realization that something doesn’t line up, something isn’t right. Either your way of doing life isn’t relevant to others (much as randomly selecting which foot presses arrows won’t stack up in that second diagram), or you just know something is… not working.

So where do we go from here? That’s where the deconstruction comes in. I refused to not make a serious effort to do the hardest DDR songs, but I didn’t know how to do them from my own method of dancing. So I went back to the beginning. I played some of the simplest songs, trying to understand what the creators of DDR intended. And I discovered something: they go out of their way to teach you to press each consecutive arrow with the next foot. Often, its written into the patterns of arrows that you can always alternate your feet. The problem is that this requires thought and planning, which isn’t necessary because the songs are so easy, so most people just take the simplest route and do it as they see fit.

So I worked on easier songs, that typically I wouldn’t bother with. This is what the deconstruction was: I looked at where I had learned bad habits, and tried to unlearn them in light of what I knew to be true in harder songs. One of these bad habits is that when you DDR, you never let your left foot press the right arrow, or your right foot press the left arrow. Since the left foot is so much closer to the left arrow, obviously you want to press it with that foot. It’s a shame that there is no real basis for this, and in the hard songs, you aren’t allowed to have such arbitrary rules.

So that brings us to reconstruction. Taking this new approach, it became clear that turning around backwards, or turning all the way to one side or the other was how the songs were intended to be done. So I slowly ramped the difficulty back up, with an “ethic” of DDR that was expanded to do the hardest songs.

An interesting side effect, which strikes at the heart of the emergent movement, was that in doing this, I could actually dance instead of breaking my back trying to hit all these arrows that my brain couldn’t keep up with. That is to say, I could actually do the purpose of the game, which was to dance, instead of trying to hit arrows. This is of course a work in progress, because, as they say… “one man’s dancing is another man’s randomly-flailing-around-pressing-arrows.”

Today’s funny link is good ole fashion aliens-abducting-cows fun: www.cowabduction.com

Comments (6)

Adam J.March 15th, 2006 at 8:20 am

Wow man, that is a shockingly insightful comparison! You have definitely helped me have a better appreciation for the emergent movement because I see first hand some of the shortcomings of the church. There are some things that need some deconstruction. There are many things in my life that need deconstruction and reconstruction as well. I need to rethink some of my ways of living and ministering. One thing that I am working on is deconstructing the idea that fearing the Lord is merely reverence and reconstructing a healthy knee shaking fear of God.

GinaMarch 15th, 2006 at 9:18 am

This was good, Eric. Good to talk about how we need to go back to the basics with our new ideas, or new “skills,” and see it from a fresh perspective.

benMarch 15th, 2006 at 11:19 am

I agree that this is a very insightful piece. I thought the same thing when you were explaining in the car on Sunday and I’ve been looking forward to reading it ever since.

I love how the idea of dance implies so much freedom and momentum.

I would just say that I think this is much more broadly applicable to the body of Christ than just emergent, but I think we all agree there.

Probably the one thing this post is lacking is “I Hope You Dance” by lee ann womack streaming while we read it. And yes, I had to google “i hope you dance” to find out who sings it.

RobMarch 15th, 2006 at 4:47 pm

eric - i owe you a guiness - because that was brilliant

i like metaphors that include dancing also, as it is one of my own favorite things to do (even if i feel constrained any time i attempt to play ddr)

sadly ben, i knew who sang that…

the wifeMarch 17th, 2006 at 10:42 am

my husband rocks!!!!

britt mooneyMarch 19th, 2006 at 6:43 pm

Eric, very well done, only now you must realize that you are a heretic for ever comparing anything having to do with God to dancing, and your continued efforts to discuss dancing will only force us to excommunicate you.

Sincerely,
The Committe against Dancing of the First Holiness Assembly of the Presbymethobapticostal Church.

Leave a comment

Your comment